NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
+751%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
2688
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
