NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
+22%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
