Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M +21%
1.615 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1344
64
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.83 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.31 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.615 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.31 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q5-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy