NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
+29%
1.332 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
238W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
