NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1831MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile
+463%
7.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1831 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
224GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.9 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.669 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.5 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
