Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +1048%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy