Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +1128%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
3840
56
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP102
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy