Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +576%
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GA106
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
12 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
95W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy