NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+444%
2.706 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
