AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)

2688 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock1785MHz

More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (125W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano +62%

8.192 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

5.027 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +29%

5979

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano +7%

28

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

26

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano +15%

60

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

52

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +5%

79

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Oct 2019

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1530 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1785 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

6GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

192bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

336.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

22

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

1408

256

TMUs

88

64

ROPs

48

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

85.68 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

157.1 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

10.05 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

5.027 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

157.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

TU116

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

TU116-300-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Board Design

175W

TDP

125W

450 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

2

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V8800

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

5

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA PG506 232

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

7

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA NVS 510

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 350

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2