NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1733MHz vs 1600MHz)
Lower TDP (180W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 288.5GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000
8.873 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+490%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1607 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
16384
160
TMUs
1024
64
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
2400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
100 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
