Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.3GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000 +298%
5.304 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1202 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1901 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
243.3GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

94.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
165.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
82.88 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
165.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF110
GP104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy