NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1291MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+244%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+181%
231
Quadro K620M
82
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+200%
54
Quadro K620M
18
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
