NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1291MHz vs 876MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+341%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+217%
2096
Quadro M600M
660
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
837 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
