NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1519MHz vs 1291MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+91%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 Mobile
1.555 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+46%
2096
Quadro P1000 Mobile
1430
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+159%
1723
Quadro P1000 Mobile
663
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1493 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1519 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
4
1152
Shading Units
512
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.30 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.61 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.30 GFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.555 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.61 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
N18P-Q1-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
