NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+474%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
10
1152
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
