NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+604%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
4
1152
Shading Units
192
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
