NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Tesla P6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)
NVIDIA Tesla P6 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1506MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Tesla P6
+107%
6.169 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Tesla P6
+75%
95
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1012 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1506 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
16
1152
Shading Units
2048
72
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.38 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
192.8 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
96.38 GFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.169 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
192.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-995-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
