NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+2338%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
16384
64
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
100 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
