Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1695MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
8576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe +2123%
31.24 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000M
136
A10 PCIe +1741%
2505
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
9216
40
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA102
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy