NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+185%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK106
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
