NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+585%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
2304
Shading Units
320
192
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
