NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Tesla T4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla T4 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 106% (1590MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla T4
+129%
8.141 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Tesla T4
+168%
5569
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Tesla T4
+176%
2600
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Tesla T4
+463%
1652
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2018
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
2304
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.8 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
254.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.13 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.141 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-895-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
