NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+640%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
2304
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
62W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
