NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+669%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
2304
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
108W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
