NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+989%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K100M
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
