NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M1200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1148MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+141%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro M1200 Mobile
1.469 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
+95%
293
Quadro M1200 Mobile
150
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
991 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1148 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
640
192
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.37 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1469 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
