NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
2296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+16819%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
2304
Shading Units
8
192
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
23W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
