Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1114MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +224%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
3072
112
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM200
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy