NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 98% (1550MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+954%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
7168
112
TMUs
448
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
