Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs ATI FirePro V8800

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and a Desktop platform GPU: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (68W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800 +83%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
640
Shading Units
1600
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
208W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy