NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1600MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
15744 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+3543%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
16384
40
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
2400W
250 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
100 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
