NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+2401%
14.31 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
30
RTX A4500 Embedded
+12966%
3920
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
RTX A4500 Embedded
+3916%
482
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
384
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
