NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M
+200%
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
12
96
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
134W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GF110
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
