NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
More VRAM (768GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (28W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
+422%
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
2
96
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
134W
TDP
28W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GT218
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
