NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
+834%
2.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GM204
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
