Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4 +4247%
9.999 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
56
96
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
TU102
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net