NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K100M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 768GB)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro K100M
+41%
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GK107
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
