Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
GRID K280Q +717%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
112
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK104
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

78W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy