NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
9104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe
+11057%
31.24 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
14
9216
Shading Units
112
288
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
78W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
G92
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
