Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +18798%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
58
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
7424
16
TMUs
232
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GA103
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
22 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy