Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock924MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE +1811%
1.892 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy