Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060 +528%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GT200B
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy