NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+12217%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
Unknown
169 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
