NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (2130MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
10.32 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+16%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2024
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
22
3584
Shading Units
2816
224
TMUs
88
96
ROPs
48
224
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.7
