Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Intel H3C XG310

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +932%
24.58 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
768
512
TMUs
48
512
ROPs
24
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
300W
850 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
22 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net