Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+30%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2015
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
