Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +23%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2
8.602 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net