Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared a Professional market GPU: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and a Desktop platform GPU: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +9%
14.75 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
GeForce 40
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
96bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
18
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
AD107
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy