Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+138%
2.381 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.956 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
